Final Fantasy VI / GAME HISTORY
Final Fantasy VI Sketch Bug: Why Revision 1.1 Matters
Community documentation identifies the missed-Sketch bug in the North American SNES release of Final Fantasy III, known elsewhere as Final Fantasy VI.
Short answer
Community documentation identifies the missed-Sketch bug in the North American SNES release of Final Fantasy III, known elsewhere as Final Fantasy VI. Revision 1.1 corrects the bug found in 1.0; an original 1.0 cartridge does not acquire that correction automatically.
Scope: North American SNES Final Fantasy III revisions 1.0 and 1.1. This is not a claim about every later port.

What a failed Sketch could change
Elephantgun’s documented playthrough shows a missed Sketch disrupting battle graphics, replacing inventory contents or stopping the game. A battle could become impossible to finish normally even while parts of the display continued moving. The cost was not simply an odd-looking sprite: items already collected could be replaced.
The account describes outcomes that depend on the formation and battle state. It does not justify promising a particular haul of rare weapons, and reports of damage to a physical cartridge are not established evidence of hardware damage.
The sequence behind the reports
Making an enemy invisible is a familiar way to force a miss, but it is not the only condition in the documented experiments. The fuller setup involves party and spell-menu state. These steps describe the risk rather than a guaranteed item-duplication recipe.
- Use the vulnerable 1.0 revision.
- Have Relm attempt Sketch under conditions where it misses, such as against an invisible target.
- The failed attempt can be followed by broken graphics, altered inventory or a freeze.
What changed afterward
The same account distinguishes the corrected 1.1 release from the original cartridge. Avoiding Sketch on a vulnerable copy avoids this particular command’s failure path; selecting a corrected release addresses the revision difference.
The checked record does not establish an official recall or an exact date for the 1.1 print run. Those details should not be added to the history merely because later copies contain a fix.
Join the conversation
Have a question, correction or a different take? Share it below. Comments appear immediately after submission.
Reader comments
Loading comments…